Forum Home


Go Back   The Weather Vane Forums > Meteorological Discussion Boards > Tropical Weather


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2007, 04:17 PM
Dustin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default


http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/



QUOTE
Quote:
Unless a dramatic and historical flurry of activity occurs in the next 9 weeks, 2007 will rank as a historically inactive TC year for the Northern Hemisphere as a whole. During the past 30 years, only 1977, 1981, and 1983 have had less activity to date (January-TODAY, Accumulated Cyclone Energy). For the period of June 1 - TODAY, only 1977 has experienced LESS tropical cyclone activity than 2007. For the North Atlantic basin, Tropical Storm Noel is currently too weak to impact any of these results. However, one should always be prepared for late-season developments since hurricane season ends on November 30.[/b]
See if the global warming theorists were correct we would had not had such a quiet year. Of course what caused this to be a quiet year has nothing to do with Sea Surface Temperatures and much more to do with teleconnections causing a strong bit of shear and a strong ridge along the southeast coast.

What do you guys think?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-30-2007, 08:22 PM
Pro Met
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Martinsville, VA
Posts: 2,156
Default

Interesting, but not surprising. 2005 was an abnormally active year, but aside from that, the last several years haven't been all that active. 2006 and 2007 have especially been rather quiet. Based on historical trends, I expect hurricane activity to continue to gradually decline over the next few decades, as we're starting to head into a 30-year period with less activity.
__________________
- Kevin

Visit my website at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2007, 10:35 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ocean Springs, MS and the University of South Alabama
Posts: 118
Send a message via AIM to Charles-KD5ZSM Send a message via Yahoo to Charles-KD5ZSM
Default

Climate will never draw a perfect line when it comes to hurricanes. you have your on and off years. i just love though how al gore says "2005's season was because of global warming and the years to come will be the same if not worse". don't know if it is me but.....i don't think last year was bad at all and this year wasn't all that horrible. we had some storms but not what "global warming" could have made.
__________________
73's DE KD5ZSM and
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2007, 05:14 AM
Hurricane
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 789
Default

Kevin, 2004 was very active for FL and then 2005 was very active aswell. Not sure if you forgot 2004?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2007, 08:58 AM
Hurricane
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 711
Default

QUOTE (Dustin @ Oct 30 2007, 04:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Quote:
http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/





See if the global warming theorists were correct we would had not had such a quiet year. Of course what caused this to be a quiet year has nothing to do with Sea Surface Temperatures and much more to do with teleconnections causing a strong bit of shear and a strong ridge along the southeast coast.

What do you guys think?[/b]
"Days of activity" is hardly the best way to track this, but it works to some extent. However, this year was still above average for the Atlantic at least.
__________________
<----- KITTY!!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2007, 12:16 PM
Pro Met
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Martinsville, VA
Posts: 2,156
Default

QUOTE (MatthewCarman @ Nov 1 2007, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Quote:
Kevin, 2004 was very active for FL and then 2005 was very active aswell. Not sure if you forgot 2004?[/b]
I didn't say anything about 2004, and several hurricanes in that season caused serious problems in Asheville; I won't forget that.
__________________
- Kevin

Visit my website at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2007, 03:49 PM
Dustin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

2004 was NOT active Matthew. That's such a misconception. 2004 just had the bermuda ridge in the right place. If Dean had gone up and destroyed houston texas people would had thought this year was active. 2004 started very late, and just had an abnormal high postion which shoved 4 storms into Florida.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2007, 10:48 PM
Pro Met
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Martinsville, VA
Posts: 2,156
Default

QUOTE (Dustin @ Nov 1 2007, 10:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Quote:
2004 was NOT active Matthew. That's such a misconception. 2004 just had the bermuda ridge in the right place. If Dean had gone up and destroyed houston texas people would had thought this year was active. 2004 started very late, and just had an abnormal high postion which shoved 4 storms into Florida.[/b]
The graph you posted at the start of this thread disagrees with that. 2004 and 2005 had almost identical numbers of tropical cyclone days. It's almost like you're disagreeing with yourself. How is a season with 15 storms, 9 hurricanes, and 8 U.S. landfalls an inactive season?
__________________
- Kevin

Visit my website at
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2007, 01:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Olympia WA
Posts: 2
Default

I think close ended statements like "Global warming has nothing to do with hurricanes" or "Humans are causing global climate change" are inherently risky because they try to marginalize an issue and squeeze phenomena such as climate and weather into a little box.

The fact is Earths weather is profoundly complicated and is subject to influence from multitudes of sources so to take the title of this thread literally and assume the Earths atmosphere heating up "has nothing to do with" the storms it produces would be ludircous.

Although I do agree.. Al Gores climate flick jumped to conclusions... apparently he to has not considered the remarkably complexity of Earths climate systems.

-newb
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Global Warming Increasing Hurricanes Dustin Tropical Weather 1 07-30-2007 07:07 PM
Proof of Global Warming Series2 Climate, Earth Sciences, & Astronomy 2 05-03-2007 04:21 AM
Global Warming makes less hurricanes Dustin Tropical Weather 3 04-18-2007 11:31 PM
Glaciers are they proof of global warming? Dustin Climate, Earth Sciences, & Astronomy 18 09-12-2006 01:10 AM
Experts: Global warming behind 2005 hurricanes sportsandweatherfreak Weather Forecast and Discussion Area 3 04-26-2006 12:15 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13